![]() "Montagnier hasn't been able to publish this in a proper journal, for a very good reason: it's nonsense. "Montagnier is promoting wild theories with little scientific basis, and now he is taking advantage of vulnerable parents (see his appeal here) to push a therapy of long-term antibiotic treatment for autistic children." Whatever he says, just don't believe him,"ĭid some googling, turns out, it's true. From baselessly defending homeopathy to becoming an antivaxxer. Dr Montagnier has been rolling downhill incredibly fast in the last few years. In my personal view, the world should be focused on China, they should be holding them to account, and the less finances that head in their direction, at the moment.the better.Īnd what happened to the scientist that wanted to tell the world about the virus that escaped, and disappeared.Shi Zhengli is her name - search for he. In all honesty, the way China are behaving, especially over the whole COVID-19 situation is disgraceful, the more that is done round the world to curb their influence, and power the better - the problem you have at the moment is there are all these entities, BLM, ANTIFA, CCP, the EU etc that all have one goal in the world, to be the rulers - and they will stop at nothing.Ĭhina are dangerous, they want to rule the world and they will stop at nothing, we still don't know if the whole CCP-Virus was man-made, there is substantial evidence to suggest that it was, but it's just hearsay until you get concrete evidence. ![]() ![]() I wouldn't worry about offending anybody, the problem is that when you have a debate, there will always be someone that will be offended - the real skill in life is to not take offence by other peoples points of view - the old adage of "sticks and stones.".a good healthy debate is guaranteed to "offend" someone down the line. What evidence do you have before suggesting spreading fake news All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts. Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. The first order was blocked by a judge in September and then again in October, while a preliminary injunction granted by another judge in December prevented the TikTok ban from going ahead. The new orders are in addition to two earlier ones signed by Trump in August that attempted to ban transactions with WeChat and TikTok's parent company, ByteDance. The named apps are extremely popular with Chinese mobile device users, and if the order was successful, the bans would be a significant blow to Chinese Americans who use apps like WeChat to communicate. Such data collection "would permit China to track the locations of federal employees and contractors, and build dossiers of personal information," the document adds. ![]() "By accessing personal electronic devices such as smartphones, tablets, and computers, Chinese connected software applications can access and capture vast swaths of information from users, including sensitive personally identifiable information and private information," the executive order states. official told Reuters that the Commerce Department plans to act before January 20, when Trump leaves office. The order tasks the Commerce Department with defining which transactions will be banned under the directive within 45 days, but a U.S. ![]() transactions with the companies behind the apps, the full list of which includes Alipay, CamScanner, QQ Wallet, SHAREit, Tencent QQ, VMate, WeChat Pay, and WPS Office. President Donald Trump on Tuesday signed an executive order banning transactions with eight Chinese apps, including WeChat Pay and AliPay (via Reuters). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |